1 | |
2 | |
3 | |
4 | |
5 | |
6 | |
7 | Network Working Group G. Vaudreuil |
8 | Request for Comments: 3463 Lucent Technologies |
9 | Obsoletes: 1893 January 2003 |
10 | Category: Standards Track |
11 | |
12 | |
13 | Enhanced Mail System Status Codes |
14 | |
15 | Status of this Memo |
16 | |
17 | This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the |
18 | Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for |
19 | improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet |
20 | Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state |
21 | and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. |
22 | |
23 | Copyright Notice |
24 | |
25 | Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2003). All Rights Reserved. |
26 | |
27 | Abstract |
28 | |
29 | This document defines a set of extended status codes for use within |
30 | the mail system for delivery status reports, tracking, and improved |
31 | diagnostics. In combination with other information provided in the |
32 | Delivery Status Notification (DSN) delivery report, these codes |
33 | facilitate media and language independent rendering of message |
34 | delivery status. |
35 | |
36 | Table of Contents |
37 | |
38 | 1. Overview ......................................................2 |
39 | 2. Status Code Structure .........................................3 |
40 | 3. Enumerated Status Codes .......................................5 |
41 | 3.1 Other or Undefined Status ...................................6 |
42 | 3.2 Address Status ..............................................6 |
43 | 3.3 Mailbox Status ..............................................7 |
44 | 3.4 Mail system status ..........................................8 |
45 | 3.5 Network and Routing Status ..................................9 |
46 | 3.6 Mail Delivery Protocol Status ..............................10 |
47 | 3.7 Message Content or Message Media Status ....................11 |
48 | 3.8 Security or Policy Status ..................................12 |
49 | 4. References ...................................................13 |
50 | 5. Security Considerations ......................................13 |
51 | Appendix A - Collected Status Codes ..........................14 |
52 | Appendix B - Changes from RFC1893 ............................15 |
53 | Author's Address .............................................15 |
54 | Full Copyright Statement .....................................16 |
55 | |
56 | |
57 | |
58 | Vaudreuil Standards Track [Page 1] |
59 | |
60 | RFC 3463 Enhanced Mail System Status Codes January 2003 |
61 | |
62 | |
63 | 1. Overview |
64 | |
65 | There is a need for a standard mechanism for the reporting of mail |
66 | system errors richer than the limited set offered by SMTP and the |
67 | system specific text descriptions sent in mail messages. There is a |
68 | pressing need for a rich machine-readable, human language independent |
69 | status code for use in delivery status notifications [DSN]. This |
70 | document proposes a new set of status codes for this purpose. |
71 | |
72 | SMTP [SMTP] error codes have historically been used for reporting |
73 | mail system errors. Because of limitations in the SMTP code design, |
74 | these are not suitable for use in delivery status notifications. |
75 | SMTP provides about 12 useful codes for delivery reports. The |
76 | majority of the codes are protocol specific response codes such as |
77 | the 354 response to the SMTP data command. Each of the 12 useful |
78 | codes are overloaded to indicate several error conditions. SMTP |
79 | suffers some scars from history, most notably the unfortunate damage |
80 | to the reply code extension mechanism by uncontrolled use. This |
81 | proposal facilitates future extensibility by requiring the client to |
82 | interpret unknown error codes according to the theory of codes while |
83 | requiring servers to register new response codes. |
84 | |
85 | The SMTP theory of reply codes are partitioned in the number space in |
86 | such a manner that the remaining available codes will not provide the |
87 | space needed. The most critical example is the existence of only 5 |
88 | remaining codes for mail system errors. The mail system |
89 | classification includes both host and mailbox error conditions. The |
90 | remaining third digit space would be completely consumed as needed to |
91 | indicate MIME and media conversion errors and security system errors. |
92 | |
93 | A revision to the SMTP theory of reply codes to better distribute the |
94 | error conditions in the number space will necessarily be incompatible |
95 | with SMTP. Further, consumption of the remaining reply-code number |
96 | space for delivery notification reporting will reduce the available |
97 | codes for new ESMTP extensions. |
98 | |
99 | The following status code set is based on the SMTP theory of reply |
100 | codes. It adopts the success, permanent error, and transient error |
101 | semantics of the first value, with a further description and |
102 | classification in the second. This proposal re-distributes the |
103 | classifications to better distribute the error conditions, such as |
104 | separating mailbox from host errors. |
105 | |
106 | Document Conventions |
107 | |
108 | The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", |
109 | "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this |
110 | document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 [RFC2119]. |
111 | |
112 | |
113 | |
114 | Vaudreuil Standards Track [Page 2] |
115 | |
116 | RFC 3463 Enhanced Mail System Status Codes January 2003 |
117 | |
118 | |
119 | 2. Status Code Structure |
120 | |
121 | This document defines a new set of status codes to report mail system |
122 | conditions. These status codes are used for media and language |
123 | independent status reporting. They are not intended for system |
124 | specific diagnostics. |
125 | |
126 | The syntax of the new status codes is defined as: |
127 | |
128 | status-code = class "." subject "." detail |
129 | |
130 | class = "2"/"4"/"5" |
131 | |
132 | subject = 1*3digit |
133 | |
134 | detail = 1*3digit |
135 | |
136 | White-space characters and comments are NOT allowed within a status- |
137 | code. Each numeric sub-code within the status-code MUST be expressed |
138 | without leading zero digits. |
139 | |
140 | Status codes consist of three numerical fields separated by ".". The |
141 | first sub-code indicates whether the delivery attempt was successful. |
142 | The second sub-code indicates the probable source of any delivery |
143 | anomalies, and the third sub-code indicates a precise error |
144 | condition. |
145 | |
146 | Example: 2.1.23 |
147 | |
148 | The code space defined is intended to be extensible only by standards |
149 | track documents. Mail system specific status codes should be mapped |
150 | as close as possible to the standard status codes. Servers should |
151 | send only defined, registered status codes. System specific errors |
152 | and diagnostics should be carried by means other than status codes. |
153 | |
154 | New subject and detail codes will be added over time. Because the |
155 | number space is large, it is not intended that published status codes |
156 | will ever be redefined or eliminated. Clients should preserve the |
157 | extensibility of the code space by reporting the general error |
158 | described in the subject sub-code when the specific detail is |
159 | unrecognized. |
160 | |
161 | |
162 | |
163 | |
164 | |
165 | |
166 | |
167 | |
168 | |
169 | |
170 | Vaudreuil Standards Track [Page 3] |
171 | |
172 | RFC 3463 Enhanced Mail System Status Codes January 2003 |
173 | |
174 | |
175 | The class sub-code provides a broad classification of the status. |
176 | The enumerated values for each class are defined as: |
177 | |
178 | 2.XXX.XXX Success |
179 | |
180 | Success specifies that the DSN is reporting a positive delivery |
181 | action. Detail sub-codes may provide notification of |
182 | transformations required for delivery. |
183 | |
184 | 4.XXX.XXX Persistent Transient Failure |
185 | |
186 | A persistent transient failure is one in which the message as |
187 | sent is valid, but persistence of some temporary condition has |
188 | caused abandonment or delay of attempts to send the message. |
189 | If this code accompanies a delivery failure report, sending in |
190 | the future may be successful. |
191 | |
192 | 5.XXX.XXX Permanent Failure |
193 | |
194 | A permanent failure is one which is not likely to be resolved |
195 | by resending the message in the current form. Some change to |
196 | the message or the destination must be made for successful |
197 | delivery. |
198 | |
199 | A client must recognize and report class sub-code even where |
200 | subsequent subject sub-codes are unrecognized. |
201 | |
202 | The subject sub-code classifies the status. This value applies to |
203 | each of the three classifications. The subject sub-code, if |
204 | recognized, must be reported even if the additional detail provided |
205 | by the detail sub-code is not recognized. The enumerated values for |
206 | the subject sub-code are: |
207 | |
208 | X.0.XXX Other or Undefined Status |
209 | |
210 | There is no additional subject information available. |
211 | |
212 | X.1.XXX Addressing Status |
213 | |
214 | The address status reports on the originator or destination |
215 | address. It may include address syntax or validity. These |
216 | errors can generally be corrected by the sender and retried. |
217 | |
218 | X.2.XXX Mailbox Status |
219 | |
220 | Mailbox status indicates that something having to do with the |
221 | mailbox has caused this DSN. Mailbox issues are assumed to be |
222 | under the general control of the recipient. |
223 | |
224 | |
225 | |
226 | Vaudreuil Standards Track [Page 4] |
227 | |
228 | RFC 3463 Enhanced Mail System Status Codes January 2003 |
229 | |
230 | |
231 | X.3.XXX Mail System Status |
232 | |
233 | Mail system status indicates that something having to do with |
234 | the destination system has caused this DSN. System issues are |
235 | assumed to be under the general control of the destination |
236 | system administrator. |
237 | |
238 | X.4.XXX Network and Routing Status |
239 | |
240 | The networking or routing codes report status about the |
241 | delivery system itself. These system components include any |
242 | necessary infrastructure such as directory and routing |
243 | services. Network issues are assumed to be under the control |
244 | of the destination or intermediate system administrator. |
245 | |
246 | X.5.XXX Mail Delivery Protocol Status |
247 | |
248 | The mail delivery protocol status codes report failures |
249 | involving the message delivery protocol. These failures |
250 | include the full range of problems resulting from |
251 | implementation errors or an unreliable connection. |
252 | |
253 | X.6.XXX Message Content or Media Status |
254 | |
255 | The message content or media status codes report failures |
256 | involving the content of the message. These codes report |
257 | failures due to translation, transcoding, or otherwise |
258 | unsupported message media. Message content or media issues are |
259 | under the control of both the sender and the receiver, both of |
260 | which must support a common set of supported content-types. |
261 | |
262 | X.7.XXX Security or Policy Status |
263 | |
264 | The security or policy status codes report failures involving |
265 | policies such as per-recipient or per-host filtering and |
266 | cryptographic operations. Security and policy status issues |
267 | are assumed to be under the control of either or both the |
268 | sender and recipient. Both the sender and recipient must |
269 | permit the exchange of messages and arrange the exchange of |
270 | necessary keys and certificates for cryptographic operations. |
271 | |
272 | 3. Enumerated Status Codes |
273 | |
274 | The following section defines and describes the detail sub-code. The |
275 | detail value provides more information about the status and is |
276 | defined relative to the subject of the status. |
277 | |
278 | |
279 | |
280 | |
281 | |
282 | Vaudreuil Standards Track [Page 5] |
283 | |
284 | RFC 3463 Enhanced Mail System Status Codes January 2003 |
285 | |
286 | |
287 | 3.1 Other or Undefined Status |
288 | |
289 | X.0.0 Other undefined Status |
290 | |
291 | Other undefined status is the only undefined error code. It |
292 | should be used for all errors for which only the class of the |
293 | error is known. |
294 | |
295 | 3.2 Address Status |
296 | |
297 | X.1.0 Other address status |
298 | |
299 | Something about the address specified in the message caused |
300 | this DSN. |
301 | |
302 | X.1.1 Bad destination mailbox address |
303 | |
304 | The mailbox specified in the address does not exist. For |
305 | Internet mail names, this means the address portion to the left |
306 | of the "@" sign is invalid. This code is only useful for |
307 | permanent failures. |
308 | |
309 | X.1.2 Bad destination system address |
310 | |
311 | The destination system specified in the address does not exist |
312 | or is incapable of accepting mail. For Internet mail names, |
313 | this means the address portion to the right of the "@" is |
314 | invalid for mail. This code is only useful for permanent |
315 | failures. |
316 | |
317 | X.1.3 Bad destination mailbox address syntax |
318 | |
319 | The destination address was syntactically invalid. This can |
320 | apply to any field in the address. This code is only useful |
321 | for permanent failures. |
322 | |
323 | X.1.4 Destination mailbox address ambiguous |
324 | |
325 | The mailbox address as specified matches one or more recipients |
326 | on the destination system. This may result if a heuristic |
327 | address mapping algorithm is used to map the specified address |
328 | to a local mailbox name. |
329 | |
330 | X.1.5 Destination address valid |
331 | |
332 | This mailbox address as specified was valid. This status code |
333 | should be used for positive delivery reports. |
334 | |
335 | |
336 | |
337 | |
338 | Vaudreuil Standards Track [Page 6] |
339 | |
340 | RFC 3463 Enhanced Mail System Status Codes January 2003 |
341 | |
342 | |
343 | X.1.6 Destination mailbox has moved, No forwarding address |
344 | |
345 | The mailbox address provided was at one time valid, but mail is |
346 | no longer being accepted for that address. This code is only |
347 | useful for permanent failures. |
348 | |
349 | X.1.7 Bad sender's mailbox address syntax |
350 | |
351 | The sender's address was syntactically invalid. This can apply |
352 | to any field in the address. |
353 | |
354 | X.1.8 Bad sender's system address |
355 | |
356 | The sender's system specified in the address does not exist or |
357 | is incapable of accepting return mail. For domain names, this |
358 | means the address portion to the right of the "@" is invalid |
359 | for mail. |
360 | |
361 | 3.3 Mailbox Status |
362 | |
363 | X.2.0 Other or undefined mailbox status |
364 | |
365 | The mailbox exists, but something about the destination mailbox |
366 | has caused the sending of this DSN. |
367 | |
368 | X.2.1 Mailbox disabled, not accepting messages |
369 | |
370 | The mailbox exists, but is not accepting messages. This may be |
371 | a permanent error if the mailbox will never be re-enabled or a |
372 | transient error if the mailbox is only temporarily disabled. |
373 | |
374 | X.2.2 Mailbox full |
375 | |
376 | The mailbox is full because the user has exceeded a per-mailbox |
377 | administrative quota or physical capacity. The general |
378 | semantics implies that the recipient can delete messages to |
379 | make more space available. This code should be used as a |
380 | persistent transient failure. |
381 | |
382 | X.2.3 Message length exceeds administrative limit |
383 | |
384 | A per-mailbox administrative message length limit has been |
385 | exceeded. This status code should be used when the per-mailbox |
386 | message length limit is less than the general system limit. |
387 | This code should be used as a permanent failure. |
388 | |
389 | |
390 | |
391 | |
392 | |
393 | |
394 | Vaudreuil Standards Track [Page 7] |
395 | |
396 | RFC 3463 Enhanced Mail System Status Codes January 2003 |
397 | |
398 | |
399 | X.2.4 Mailing list expansion problem |
400 | |
401 | The mailbox is a mailing list address and the mailing list was |
402 | unable to be expanded. This code may represent a permanent |
403 | failure or a persistent transient failure. |
404 | |
405 | 3.4 Mail system status |
406 | |
407 | X.3.0 Other or undefined mail system status |
408 | |
409 | The destination system exists and normally accepts mail, but |
410 | something about the system has caused the generation of this |
411 | DSN. |
412 | |
413 | X.3.1 Mail system full |
414 | |
415 | Mail system storage has been exceeded. The general semantics |
416 | imply that the individual recipient may not be able to delete |
417 | material to make room for additional messages. This is useful |
418 | only as a persistent transient error. |
419 | |
420 | X.3.2 System not accepting network messages |
421 | |
422 | The host on which the mailbox is resident is not accepting |
423 | messages. Examples of such conditions include an immanent |
424 | shutdown, excessive load, or system maintenance. This is |
425 | useful for both permanent and persistent transient errors. |
426 | |
427 | X.3.3 System not capable of selected features |
428 | |
429 | Selected features specified for the message are not supported |
430 | by the destination system. This can occur in gateways when |
431 | features from one domain cannot be mapped onto the supported |
432 | feature in another. |
433 | |
434 | X.3.4 Message too big for system |
435 | |
436 | The message is larger than per-message size limit. This limit |
437 | may either be for physical or administrative reasons. This is |
438 | useful only as a permanent error. |
439 | |
440 | X.3.5 System incorrectly configured |
441 | |
442 | The system is not configured in a manner that will permit it to |
443 | accept this message. |
444 | |
445 | |
446 | |
447 | |
448 | |
449 | |
450 | Vaudreuil Standards Track [Page 8] |
451 | |
452 | RFC 3463 Enhanced Mail System Status Codes January 2003 |
453 | |
454 | |
455 | 3.5 Network and Routing Status |
456 | |
457 | X.4.0 Other or undefined network or routing status |
458 | |
459 | Something went wrong with the networking, but it is not clear |
460 | what the problem is, or the problem cannot be well expressed |
461 | with any of the other provided detail codes. |
462 | |
463 | X.4.1 No answer from host |
464 | |
465 | The outbound connection attempt was not answered, because |
466 | either the remote system was busy, or was unable to take a |
467 | call. This is useful only as a persistent transient error. |
468 | |
469 | X.4.2 Bad connection |
470 | |
471 | The outbound connection was established, but was unable to |
472 | complete the message transaction, either because of time-out, |
473 | or inadequate connection quality. This is useful only as a |
474 | persistent transient error. |
475 | |
476 | X.4.3 Directory server failure |
477 | |
478 | The network system was unable to forward the message, because a |
479 | directory server was unavailable. This is useful only as a |
480 | persistent transient error. |
481 | |
482 | The inability to connect to an Internet DNS server is one |
483 | example of the directory server failure error. |
484 | |
485 | X.4.4 Unable to route |
486 | |
487 | The mail system was unable to determine the next hop for the |
488 | message because the necessary routing information was |
489 | unavailable from the directory server. This is useful for both |
490 | permanent and persistent transient errors. |
491 | |
492 | A DNS lookup returning only an SOA (Start of Administration) |
493 | record for a domain name is one example of the unable to route |
494 | error. |
495 | |
496 | X.4.5 Mail system congestion |
497 | |
498 | The mail system was unable to deliver the message because the |
499 | mail system was congested. This is useful only as a persistent |
500 | transient error. |
501 | |
502 | |
503 | |
504 | |
505 | |
506 | Vaudreuil Standards Track [Page 9] |
507 | |
508 | RFC 3463 Enhanced Mail System Status Codes January 2003 |
509 | |
510 | |
511 | X.4.6 Routing loop detected |
512 | |
513 | A routing loop caused the message to be forwarded too many |
514 | times, either because of incorrect routing tables or a user- |
515 | forwarding loop. This is useful only as a persistent transient |
516 | error. |
517 | |
518 | X.4.7 Delivery time expired |
519 | |
520 | The message was considered too old by the rejecting system, |
521 | either because it remained on that host too long or because the |
522 | time-to-live value specified by the sender of the message was |
523 | exceeded. If possible, the code for the actual problem found |
524 | when delivery was attempted should be returned rather than this |
525 | code. |
526 | |
527 | 3.6 Mail Delivery Protocol Status |
528 | |
529 | X.5.0 Other or undefined protocol status |
530 | |
531 | Something was wrong with the protocol necessary to deliver the |
532 | message to the next hop and the problem cannot be well |
533 | expressed with any of the other provided detail codes. |
534 | |
535 | X.5.1 Invalid command |
536 | |
537 | A mail transaction protocol command was issued which was either |
538 | out of sequence or unsupported. This is useful only as a |
539 | permanent error. |
540 | |
541 | X.5.2 Syntax error |
542 | |
543 | A mail transaction protocol command was issued which could not |
544 | be interpreted, either because the syntax was wrong or the |
545 | command is unrecognized. This is useful only as a permanent |
546 | error. |
547 | |
548 | X.5.3 Too many recipients |
549 | |
550 | More recipients were specified for the message than could have |
551 | been delivered by the protocol. This error should normally |
552 | result in the segmentation of the message into two, the |
553 | remainder of the recipients to be delivered on a subsequent |
554 | delivery attempt. It is included in this list in the event |
555 | that such segmentation is not possible. |
556 | |
557 | |
558 | |
559 | |
560 | |
561 | |
562 | Vaudreuil Standards Track [Page 10] |
563 | |
564 | RFC 3463 Enhanced Mail System Status Codes January 2003 |
565 | |
566 | |
567 | X.5.4 Invalid command arguments |
568 | |
569 | A valid mail transaction protocol command was issued with |
570 | invalid arguments, either because the arguments were out of |
571 | range or represented unrecognized features. This is useful |
572 | only as a permanent error. |
573 | |
574 | X.5.5 Wrong protocol version |
575 | |
576 | A protocol version mis-match existed which could not be |
577 | automatically resolved by the communicating parties. |
578 | |
579 | 3.7 Message Content or Message Media Status |
580 | |
581 | X.6.0 Other or undefined media error |
582 | |
583 | Something about the content of a message caused it to be |
584 | considered undeliverable and the problem cannot be well |
585 | expressed with any of the other provided detail codes. |
586 | |
587 | X.6.1 Media not supported |
588 | |
589 | The media of the message is not supported by either the |
590 | delivery protocol or the next system in the forwarding path. |
591 | This is useful only as a permanent error. |
592 | |
593 | X.6.2 Conversion required and prohibited |
594 | |
595 | The content of the message must be converted before it can be |
596 | delivered and such conversion is not permitted. Such |
597 | prohibitions may be the expression of the sender in the message |
598 | itself or the policy of the sending host. |
599 | |
600 | X.6.3 Conversion required but not supported |
601 | |
602 | The message content must be converted in order to be forwarded |
603 | but such conversion is not possible or is not practical by a |
604 | host in the forwarding path. This condition may result when an |
605 | ESMTP gateway supports 8bit transport but is not able to |
606 | downgrade the message to 7 bit as required for the next hop. |
607 | |
608 | X.6.4 Conversion with loss performed |
609 | |
610 | This is a warning sent to the sender when message delivery was |
611 | successfully but when the delivery required a conversion in |
612 | which some data was lost. This may also be a permanent error |
613 | if the sender has indicated that conversion with loss is |
614 | prohibited for the message. |
615 | |
616 | |
617 | |
618 | Vaudreuil Standards Track [Page 11] |
619 | |
620 | RFC 3463 Enhanced Mail System Status Codes January 2003 |
621 | |
622 | |
623 | X.6.5 Conversion Failed |
624 | |
625 | A conversion was required but was unsuccessful. This may be |
626 | useful as a permanent or persistent temporary notification. |
627 | |
628 | 3.8 Security or Policy Status |
629 | |
630 | X.7.0 Other or undefined security status |
631 | |
632 | Something related to security caused the message to be |
633 | returned, and the problem cannot be well expressed with any of |
634 | the other provided detail codes. This status code may also be |
635 | used when the condition cannot be further described because of |
636 | security policies in force. |
637 | |
638 | X.7.1 Delivery not authorized, message refused |
639 | |
640 | The sender is not authorized to send to the destination. This |
641 | can be the result of per-host or per-recipient filtering. This |
642 | memo does not discuss the merits of any such filtering, but |
643 | provides a mechanism to report such. This is useful only as a |
644 | permanent error. |
645 | |
646 | X.7.2 Mailing list expansion prohibited |
647 | |
648 | The sender is not authorized to send a message to the intended |
649 | mailing list. This is useful only as a permanent error. |
650 | |
651 | X.7.3 Security conversion required but not possible |
652 | |
653 | A conversion from one secure messaging protocol to another was |
654 | required for delivery and such conversion was not possible. |
655 | This is useful only as a permanent error. |
656 | |
657 | X.7.4 Security features not supported |
658 | |
659 | A message contained security features such as secure |
660 | authentication that could not be supported on the delivery |
661 | protocol. This is useful only as a permanent error. |
662 | |
663 | X.7.5 Cryptographic failure |
664 | |
665 | A transport system otherwise authorized to validate or decrypt |
666 | a message in transport was unable to do so because necessary |
667 | information such as key was not available or such information |
668 | was invalid. |
669 | |
670 | |
671 | |
672 | |
673 | |
674 | Vaudreuil Standards Track [Page 12] |
675 | |
676 | RFC 3463 Enhanced Mail System Status Codes January 2003 |
677 | |
678 | |
679 | X.7.6 Cryptographic algorithm not supported |
680 | |
681 | A transport system otherwise authorized to validate or decrypt |
682 | a message was unable to do so because the necessary algorithm |
683 | was not supported. |
684 | |
685 | X.7.7 Message integrity failure |
686 | |
687 | A transport system otherwise authorized to validate a message |
688 | was unable to do so because the message was corrupted or |
689 | altered. This may be useful as a permanent, transient |
690 | persistent, or successful delivery code. |
691 | |
692 | 4. Normative References |
693 | |
694 | [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate |
695 | Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997. |
696 | |
697 | [SMTP] Postel, J., "Simple Mail Transfer Protocol", STD 10, RFC |
698 | 821, August 1982. |
699 | |
700 | [DSN] Moore, K. and G. Vaudreuil, "An Extensible Message Format |
701 | for Delivery Status Notifications", RFC 3464, January 2003. |
702 | |
703 | 5. Security Considerations |
704 | |
705 | This document describes a status code system with increased |
706 | precision. Use of these status codes may disclose additional |
707 | information about how an internal mail system is implemented beyond |
708 | that currently available. |
709 | |
710 | |
711 | |
712 | |
713 | |
714 | |
715 | |
716 | |
717 | |
718 | |
719 | |
720 | |
721 | |
722 | |
723 | |
724 | |
725 | |
726 | |
727 | |
728 | |
729 | |
730 | Vaudreuil Standards Track [Page 13] |
731 | |
732 | RFC 3463 Enhanced Mail System Status Codes January 2003 |
733 | |
734 | |
735 | Appendix A - Collected Status Codes |
736 | |
737 | X.1.0 Other address status |
738 | X.1.1 Bad destination mailbox address |
739 | X.1.2 Bad destination system address |
740 | X.1.3 Bad destination mailbox address syntax |
741 | X.1.4 Destination mailbox address ambiguous |
742 | X.1.5 Destination mailbox address valid |
743 | X.1.6 Mailbox has moved |
744 | X.1.7 Bad sender's mailbox address syntax |
745 | X.1.8 Bad sender's system address |
746 | |
747 | X.2.0 Other or undefined mailbox status |
748 | X.2.1 Mailbox disabled, not accepting messages |
749 | X.2.2 Mailbox full |
750 | X.2.3 Message length exceeds administrative limit. |
751 | X.2.4 Mailing list expansion problem |
752 | |
753 | X.3.0 Other or undefined mail system status |
754 | X.3.1 Mail system full |
755 | X.3.2 System not accepting network messages |
756 | X.3.3 System not capable of selected features |
757 | X.3.4 Message too big for system |
758 | |
759 | X.4.0 Other or undefined network or routing status |
760 | X.4.1 No answer from host |
761 | X.4.2 Bad connection |
762 | X.4.3 Routing server failure |
763 | X.4.4 Unable to route |
764 | X.4.5 Network congestion |
765 | X.4.6 Routing loop detected |
766 | X.4.7 Delivery time expired |
767 | |
768 | X.5.0 Other or undefined protocol status |
769 | X.5.1 Invalid command |
770 | X.5.2 Syntax error |
771 | X.5.3 Too many recipients |
772 | X.5.4 Invalid command arguments |
773 | X.5.5 Wrong protocol version |
774 | |
775 | X.6.0 Other or undefined media error |
776 | X.6.1 Media not supported |
777 | X.6.2 Conversion required and prohibited |
778 | X.6.3 Conversion required but not supported |
779 | X.6.4 Conversion with loss performed |
780 | X.6.5 Conversion failed |
781 | |
782 | |
783 | |
784 | |
785 | |
786 | Vaudreuil Standards Track [Page 14] |
787 | |
788 | RFC 3463 Enhanced Mail System Status Codes January 2003 |
789 | |
790 | |
791 | X.7.0 Other or undefined security status |
792 | X.7.1 Delivery not authorized, message refused |
793 | X.7.2 Mailing list expansion prohibited |
794 | X.7.3 Security conversion required but not possible |
795 | X.7.4 Security features not supported |
796 | X.7.5 Cryptographic failure |
797 | X.7.6 Cryptographic algorithm not supported |
798 | X.7.7 Message integrity failure |
799 | |
800 | Appendix B - Changes from RFC1893 |
801 | |
802 | Changed Authors contact information. |
803 | |
804 | Updated required standards boilerplate. |
805 | |
806 | Edited the text to make it spell-checker and grammar checker |
807 | compliant. |
808 | |
809 | Modified the text describing the persistent transient failure to more |
810 | closely reflect current practice and understanding. |
811 | |
812 | Eliminated the restriction on the X.4.7 codes limiting them to |
813 | persistent transient errors. |
814 | |
815 | Author's Address |
816 | |
817 | Gregory M. Vaudreuil |
818 | Lucent Technologies |
819 | 7291 Williamson Rd |
820 | Dallas, Tx. 75214 |
821 | |
822 | Phone: +1 214 823 9325 |
823 | EMail: GregV@ieee.org |
824 | |
825 | |
826 | |
827 | |
828 | |
829 | |
830 | |
831 | |
832 | |
833 | |
834 | |
835 | |
836 | |
837 | |
838 | |
839 | |
840 | |
841 | |
842 | Vaudreuil Standards Track [Page 15] |
843 | |
844 | RFC 3463 Enhanced Mail System Status Codes January 2003 |
845 | |
846 | |
847 | Full Copyright Statement |
848 | |
849 | Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2003). All Rights Reserved. |
850 | |
851 | This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to |
852 | others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it |
853 | or assist in its implementation may be prepared, copied, published |
854 | and distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any |
855 | kind, provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph are |
856 | included on all such copies and derivative works. However, this |
857 | document itself may not be modified in any way, such as by removing |
858 | the copyright notice or references to the Internet Society or other |
859 | Internet organizations, except as needed for the purpose of |
860 | developing Internet standards in which case the procedures for |
861 | copyrights defined in the Internet Standards process must be |
862 | followed, or as required to translate it into languages other than |
863 | English. |
864 | |
865 | The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not be |
866 | revoked by the Internet Society or its successors or assigns. |
867 | |
868 | This document and the information contained herein is provided on an |
869 | "AS IS" basis and THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING |
870 | TASK FORCE DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING |
871 | BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION |
872 | HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF |
873 | MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. |
874 | |
875 | Acknowledgement |
876 | |
877 | Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the |
878 | Internet Society. |
879 | |
880 | |
881 | |
882 | |
883 | |
884 | |
885 | |
886 | |
887 | |
888 | |
889 | |
890 | |
891 | |
892 | |
893 | |
894 | |
895 | |
896 | |
897 | |
898 | Vaudreuil Standards Track [Page 16] |
899 | |